Author: pendari1090

Jessica was selected to be a Harvard Radcliffe Institute Fellow (Helen Putnam Fellow) for the 2022-2023 academic year

The Harvard Radcliffe Institute Fellowship Program, now in its 22nd year, offers scholars and practitioners in the arts, humanities, journalism, sciences, and social sciences a chance to pursue their latest passions. This year, the program traditionally accepted only 50 fellows for the 2022-2023 class from across Harvard University and around the world. The historical acceptance […]

Yumei and Xinzhou’s paper about inflated FDR of popular DE methods was published in Genome Biology

Yumei and Xinzhou’s paper about inflated FDR of popular DE methods was published in Genome Biology

Thanks to the collaboration with Dr. Wei Li’s lab at UC Irvine, Yumei (UC Irvine) and Xinzhou co-wrote this article about inflated false discovery rates of popular differential expression methods on population RNA-seq samples. This phenomenon was discovered by permutation analysis. The work was published in Genome Biology. Here is the UCLA News. Congratulations!

Ruochen’s review paper about the zero-inflation controversy in the scRNA-seq field was published in Genome Biology

Ruochen’s review paper about the zero-inflation controversy in the scRNA-seq field was published in Genome Biology

Ruochen, Tianyi, and Dongyuan co-wrote this review article about the zero-inflation controversy in the single-cell RNA-seq field. In particular, we clarify statistical and biological concepts; introduce 5 mechanisms of adding non-biological zeros for fair method benchmarking; and compare 3 input data types: observed, imputed, and binarized counts. The work was published in Genome Biology. Here is the UCLA News. Congratulations!

Jessica on the Philosophy of Data Science Podcast with Glen Colopy | Advancing Statistical Genomics

In the podcast, Jessica describes common statistical pitfalls in genomic data analysis & the statistical reasoning required to correct these mistakes. Common themes throughout include: hypothesis-driven science & critical scientific reasoning over data p-values and non-sensical null hypotheses/distributions the value of appearing statistically rigorous researchers cutting intellectual corners & digging themselves into local minima